Lecture at the University of Cambridge, 7 May 2014.
Conference «Structural Change in the Swiss Gas Industry», ior/cf HSG, 21 March 2014
Guest lecture at the Faculty of Law of the University of Bergen, Norway, 4 March 2014.
Business Club Zürich, Zunfthaus "Zur Saffran", 27.2.2014, 11.30 h.
Fifth Annual Conference on Competition Enforcement in the CEE Member States, 21st February 2014 in Bratislava.
Conference on “Landmark Decisions in Direct Tax Jurisprudence”organised by the University of Luxembourg and the Johannes Kepler University Linz.
Courts of Regional Economic and Political Integration Agreements, in: The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication, ed. by Cesare Romano, Karen J. Alter and Yuval Shany, Oxford University Press 2014, 250 - 277.
Participation in the closing panel of the conference organised by the University of Luxembourg under the scientific responsibility of Professor Eleftheria Neframi. Other panelists were: Professor Herwig Hofmann, University of Luxembourg, Judge Lars Bay Larsen, Court of Justice of the European Union, Judge Otto Czucz, General Court of the European Union, Arjen Meij, Visiting Professor at the University of Luxembourg, Advocate General Paolo Mengozzi, Court of Justice of the European Union.
Hotel Baur au Lac, Talstrasse 1, CH-8001 Zurich, 18.30.
High-Level Lecture on the ENP in a Comparative Perspective, College of Europe, Bruges, 24 October 2013
The notion of European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) does not, according to common usage, relate to the Agreement on European Economic Area (EEA). This far-reaching association agreement was signed by the EC and its then 12 Member States and the then 7 EFTA States Austria, Finland, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, Sweden and Switzerland on 2 May 1992, it entered into force on 1 January 1994 for five EFTA States (Austria, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden) and has since mid-1995 consisted of the EU and its Member States on the one hand and the 3 EFTA States Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway on the other. Among all the agreements concluded by the EU, the EEA Agreement stands out because it gives the associated States the right to have their own Surveillance Authority, the ESA, and their own court, the EFTA Court. The EFTA Court is basically obliged to follow or take into account relevant ECJ case law, but in the majority of its cases tackles novel legal questions. The ECJ, it’s Advocates General and the CFI for their part conduct a regular judicial dialogue with the EFTA Court. The question may be posed whether the EEA could serve as a model for other regional associations. For the fourth EFTA State, Switzerland, this issue could become relevant in the near future.